»
you're reading...
App & Architecture

Some Characteristics of Applications for Enterprises

For the topic, ‘Enterprise Applications’ is perhaps more common term but there were some disputes over it. Indeed, the word ‘enterprise’ has some special habits or meaning in IT field. In many cases, it is more like a summary of the technical features for some of applications: mass data, multi-users, concurrent operations, distributed computing, load balancing, integration, and so on. I think that sort of technical features are objective phenomenons, there are different points in different situations, not much doubt just about them.

In the essay, however, I will a bit avoid this common sense, as the use ‘for enterprises’ implied: the ‘enterprises’, is referred to as a generalized user, that is, businesses or organizations which could be commercial, nonprofit, government, and so on. And, in comparison, there are the applications for Individuals.

“As a user,” it reflected the primary position I like to stand on: talking about the applications from the using perspective, and then, it would be (naturally) taken into some technical issues/needs and some thing could be out of the common views, such as the model-driven as an essential requirement come from Customers[1].

In fact, to an application for an enterprise, who is a user, that is a question: the users could be an organic group comprised of different roles, which cooperates with each other, with some scheduled objectives and management.

For example, the multi-users (mass users) is not a unique characteristic to the applications for enterprises. (yet, the mass data, concurrent operations, etc.) An application for individuals can also has huge users (such as an email system) or mass-data, and so forth.

So, what is the characteristics of the applications for enterprises? In to my experience and understanding, there are three basic characteristics:

The first, organizational objectives and strategy: it can be decomposed into a complex structure or organic composition, can include many different levels and interrelated goals. Organizational objectives for the applications are always of the business, rather than software features.

The second, collaboration: It not merely need to support open and dynamic work groups, but also to support individuals, organizations, internal, external, multi-layered, complex collaboration.

The third, the fitness for management: a concept I coined[2] according to Dr. Joseph M. Juran’s concept fitness for use, that is, the quality which satisfy the requirements for managing the applications. For example, from the using planning, the process and outcomes, the authorization and state of operators, the logs of the operations and the traceability, to the configuration, deployment, etc., all of these are required to provide specific functionality to support.

In contrast to these, all of the pure technical features are not the nature of the applications for enterprises, though, of course, some technical features are necessary in most cases, but it may also be needed for some applications for individuals. Based on the user’s and the organizational position but not the IT position, this is the key point for the essay, and it can also bring us new demands and inspiration to our technology.

—-

[1] Model-Driven: An Essential Requirement Come from Customers

[2] From Fitness for Use to Fitness for Management – A Subject for Quality Management in Depth (in Chinese)

Advertisements

About TY

interested in models & modeling, software, information systems, applications & engineering for enterprises

Discussion

4 thoughts on “Some Characteristics of Applications for Enterprises

  1. 1. “… all of the pure technical features are not the nature of the applications for enterprises”

    yep, tech features often hide the view on the ‘real’ issues!

    2. “And, in comparison, there are the applications for Individuals.”

    Do you mean ‘for consumers’ mainly?

    3. Isn’t collaboration in the non-enterprise context quite complex as well? (perhaps just in adifferent way?)

    Have fun
    |=

    Posted by modelpractice | December 13, 2011, 00:52
    • Good questions!

      To the 2., About the “applications for individuals,” I meant that such as many of the traditional apps in a Personal Computer.

      (In fact I’m not sure whether it should use the plural or the singular for the ‘enterprise’ and ‘individual’–I just wanted to highlight the use for ‘enterprise’ in the meaning as an entity (countable) but didn’t want to use ‘organization’.)

      To the 3., of course, today in Internet environment, the individuals are doing much “collaboration” on the social applications, neither traditional enterprise app nor tranditional individual app, I think it may be classified as a third-class of applications? It is different from the app for enterprise, on such as the organizational objectives and management requirements.

      Posted by TY | December 13, 2011, 10:58
  2. “t is different from the app for enterprise, on such as the organizational objectives and management requirements.”

    ok, now I got it!

    |=

    Posted by modelpractice | December 13, 2011, 18:00

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Complexity Aware Modelling I | Model Practice - December 13, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Archives

Subscribe notifications of new posts by email.

Join 62 other followers

%d bloggers like this: